Compare
Royal Enfield Himalayan 450 vs KTM 390 Adventure X: ergonomics & fit compared
Royal Enfield Himalayan 450 sits 0.2 in lower. Here’s how both fit riders of different sizes.
Your measurements →Comparing for 5′10″
Units
Fit by rider size
| Rider | Royal Enfield Himalayan 450 | Ground reach | KTM 390 Adventure X | Ground reach |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5′1″ | 62 | Tiptoes on one foot | 63 | Tiptoes on one foot |
| 5′4″ | 73 | One foot flat, hips shifted | 73 | One foot flat, hips shifted |
| 5′7″ | 80 | Balls of both feet | 82 | Balls of both feet |
| 5′10″ | 84 | Both feet flat | 85 | Both feet flat |
| 6′1″ | 77 | Both feet flat, knees bent | 79 | Both feet flat, knees bent |
| 6′4″ | 70 | Both feet flat, knees bent | 72 | Both feet flat, knees bent |
Reference riders with average proportions and 20 mm boot soles. Your proportions may differ.
| Specification | Royal Enfield Himalayan 450 | KTM 390 Adventure X |
|---|---|---|
| Seat height | 32.5 in | 32.7 in |
| Wet weight | 432 lb | 401 lb |
| Wheelbase | 59.4 in | 57.9 in |
| Power | 29 kW | 33 kW |
| Category | Adventure | Adventure |